Видео

@@RM-vj4ni Solar Power from Arma 3 OST

@@Viper1Zero thank you!!

@@PatrioticSam Great suggestion! Will make a note to get something like that together when I get home in October. Thank you!

@@Viper1Zero Wow, thanks! If you think it'll make a good video, I look forward to that. I'd trust your mod recommendations more than some random star rating on the Steam workshop. Love your videos.

@@PatrioticSam Thanks for the support and kind words my friend! Glad you enjoy!

@@Liqweed1337 Yeah it just depends on the server, some have whitelisted mods which is nice. Most big servers that run mods have a Discord where they post mod lists for easy access though.

@@daltongeouge4474 When my server is back running when I get back from deployment I’ll have an aircraft playground and have some Su-35s

@@Viper1Zero sweet I just got back from a deployment not to long ago

@@adamesposito3662 Thank you my friend! Doing well, out here with a great crew. Home in October :)

@@eduardoandres5989 🫡

@@jarentz Tons of games are going back to the retro look these days.

@@Viper1Zero I can’t imagine why. It seems ridiculous. 🙄 I mean graphics are as important to a game as special effects are to movies. Good effects won’t save a bad film. But there’s a point where you’d just lost the audience if a movie today tried to use effects from decades ago. It’s just sorta horrible and distracting. Especially selling it for more than about $5 as a smart phone game. This on a PC?! It’s like a joke. VR games have sorta the same problem but at least you’re in VR. But they look like games from 20 years ago. The only worthwhile games on that list IMO are DCS and MSFS 👍 both for the fidelity and graphics.

@@jarentz Except it’s not a joke because there is a massive audience for retro aesthetic type games. Guys like me who grew up with games looking way worse than this can enjoy new mechanics and gameplay but in a way that hits that nostalgia. It’s clearly not for you, and no one’s putting a gun to your head to buy it. Being mad a thing exists that other people enjoy is about as “old man yells at cloud” as you can get. MSFS and DCS are both super high fidelity, yes. Games I also love, but you can love games that aren’t the highest max graphics game as well. Judging by how hundreds of thousands of people continue to buy retro games I’d say they’re going nowhere.

@@Viper1Zero whatever, I just don’t see the appeal myself. I agree with you on the point of having TrackIR support in these games being a must-have. At least it has that.

@@jarentz And I’m not saying you SHOULD see the appeal lol. It’s clearly not your thing and that’s ok. Yes, TrackIR is god tier and I’m not playing a flight game that doesn’t support it. Ha.

@@WalrusWinking For their time they were good, but yeah they’re outdated now. W28 and W35 are my new go-to.

I'd like to start off with two things: 1. "... very sad times for flight sims..." as opposed to when? Was there ever a better time? Please, really... please tell us all, what we missed and when it passed us by? 2. Are you always such a 'Grumpy ol' bastard', or is it simply because you just can't get it up anymore... ... into the air, ... ... in a Flight Sim, I mean?! Now, the real observations: 1. Why do you have such a massive problem with 'Early Access' games? They're a much better solution, than the, 'Old Ways', when you had to buy the game at full price, and only then find out it was a 'bug-ridden' piece of crap, which would only do about half as much as the devs promised, that is, when it'll actually start. After which the devs stay silent until either they've thousands of angry buyers threatening to lynch 'em or, as is more likely, the Computer & Gaming Media get involved. Even then the devs take weeks to deliver the first patch, and 18mths, if we're lucky, until it'll be finished to the level it should have been at launch! Today's 'Early Access' games are NOT scamming us, because players know what they're getting into, usually, at a reduced price or for free. By doing this the devs, allow players to get involved in the game, by playing it, having fun, with it and all the while helping the devs to improve things to a greater degree and to a higher standard, by having thousands more hours of testing. Gamers can also influence the way the games develop and are made, they also add new ideas, which is a fantastic feeling if one of your ideas make the final game. 2. It's obvious that you have no idea what you're talking about, and that you don't actually play any of the games you so easily dismiss. Of course DCS and MSFS are both guilty of being a, "... money making platform... ", that's the whole point of any game, computer utility, business, multi-corporation or corner shop. How can you be so blind & stupid not to get that? That's because, DCS World is actually NOT, "... a very old buggy engine...", and hasn't been for quite a long time. The users mostly used the Beta version, which may occasionally have 'thrown a wobbly', but there was always a stable version, if you wanted it. Furthermore, as of Oct '23 Eagle Dynamics removed the Beta Test version altogether! Oh, and BTW, ... ... DCS World is actually, totally and completely ... ... FREE! Yes, it is! It comes with two fully working Aircraft Modules, one's a piston-powered fighter-trainer, the TF-51D Mustang, whilst the other is a weapons-functional ground-attack jet, the Su-25T Frogfoot, in addition, DCS currently includes two free maps to use them on: 1. The Caucasus Region and Black Sea Map that encompasses much of Georgia and a bit of Russia. 2. The Marianas Archipelago Map which is 2,000 km south of Japan and includes Guam, Rota, Tinian, Saipan, and a score of lesser islands. Add onto that at least 4 extremely high quality, yet FREE 'community-made' aircraft & an in-house, in-development WWII era version of the Marianas Map, to be added later for... ... FREE! So tell us again, exactly how Eagle Dynamics' DCS World is... just a "Money-Making Platform"? It ONLY becomes that, if YOU want it to, by buying only the add-on modules that you want. I can't comment on, 'HOTDS' or 'Nuclear Option', as I've never used either of them. But then, do you even have the right to pass comment on things you've only read or dreamt about? I mean, why... WHY would you ever even try them? Because, just based on your vague, hateful descriptions plus your utter loathing and contempt for such 'ffiscally-bleeding' titles and those horrible 'Early Access' games, I know you wouldn't contemplate using, or even trying, them. 🤪😲🫢 _😂🤣

@@delitost_404 blastcore

@@Viper1ZeroUh... I searched for Blastcore and there are a ton of them. Hmm... I guess I'll have to download everything. thank you

@@Viper1Zero I tried applying it, but it doesn't work. Even though I installed both the blastcore murr version and the ~edited version, it did not apply.

@@delitost_404 Dont think they both work together correctly.

I think it would be better to make a mod. Thank you for answering my question.

@@_LindZman Thank you! Honestly this video was just the USAF mod and Firewill’s F-22 for historical shots. I don’t have any aircraft only mod lists unfortunately:/

@@Viper1Zero do you know of any good Russian aircraft mods?

@@_LindZman RHSAFRF, Su-35 Super Flanker, Legends of the USSR, Soviet Air Force Pack by Pook.

@@Theboyfromjupiter That feels like a whole RUclips channel ago. 😂

​@Viper1Zero 😂 exactly, keep up the good work!!!

I'd say just upgrade cpu and you'll be gtg

@@haber1259 Truly appreciate the kind words! Im deployed at the moment but should be back to posting in late October :)